I I would choose English Economist Thomas Malthus. I would choose Malthus because he inspired Darwin in his discovery of natural selection.
2.
Malthus was a demographer and political
economist, known for his views on population growth. He made a prediction that population would
outrun food, which would lead to a decrease in food per person. Malthus used animals as an example by
pointing out that when nature animal’s increase is because there is plenty of
resources and less predators. Although Malthus hypothesis was proven wrong, he
did influence Charles Darwin to extend his principles not only to humans, but
to all organisms.
(New World Encyclopedia)
3.
This is the point I feel was most affected by
Malthus.
*Who gets better access to these
limited resources? Is it random? Or are some organism better “fit” to the
environment, enabling them to compete more successfully for resources and avoid
predation better than others? Darwin hypothesized that organisms with traits
that were better adapted to their environment would have greater reproductive
success because those traits allowed them to be more competitive for the things
they needed to reproduce.
Even though Malthus hypothesis in
regards to humans was proven to be untrue it opened up some doors to look into
other organisms that might be affected by his views. As Charles Darwin
recognized that the size of a population can in fact impact the availability of
resources. The constant war for food and water can only be won by those who are
stronger which meant greater chances of survival. This is something we now see
in real life. An example would be sharks and smaller sea creatures. We have
even seen it with humans, for example when there’s a catastrophe people who
lose everything try to take what others have in order to survive. I believe that Darwin’s hypothesis that
organisms with traits that were better adapted to their environment would have
a greater reproductive success. Perhaps we can see it as the stronger creatures
survive.
4. I do believe that Darwin would have developed
his theory without the influence of Malthus. Darwin had many influences such as
his voyage which allowed him to see what nature had to offer. Perhaps without
Malthus influence it would have taken him longer to come up with his theory;
however, I believe Darwin’s passion and determination was his greatest
influence.
5.
Darwin was afraid of contradicting the church’s
belief that God was the only one responsible in the creation of all living
things. Darwin was afraid of ruining his and his grandfather’s reputation. After
23 years of research finally decided he felt he had enough evidence to publish
his book called Origins of Species,
which is considered the book that t revolutionized biological science.
Curious about this statement: "Although Malthus hypothesis was proven wrong..."
ReplyDeleteWhat about his hypothesis was demonstrated to be wrong? I see that you later reference his work regarding humans being shown to be incorrect. Some of his ideas were extreme (such as severe population control) but many of his basic concepts regarding the relationship between resources and population size are exactly correct.
While I agree that it is possible that Darwin could have still developed his theory without Malthus' work, I also agree that it would have taken much, much longer. Malthus was an "ah-ha!" moment for Darwin. His work was key.
Reputations were at issue, but also social status and being ostracized. Darwin's wife was very religious. This could have had a horrible impact on her.
Good post.